Which distinction is most fundamental when differentiating teacher-made and standardized tests?
The basic difference is who develops the test: classroom teachers for teacher-made tests, specialists for standardized tests.
The basic difference is who develops the test: classroom teachers for teacher-made tests, specialists for standardized tests.
A test developed by specialists and given under established procedures is a standardized test.
In extended-response tests students must generate and organize their own answers, so copying is comparatively difficult.
Extended-response essays give learners the most opportunity to select evidence, synthesize and organize an argument.
Restricted-response items limit the range and organization of acceptable answers, which makes scoring more consistent.
Freedom to select and organize content is the mark of an extended-response essay.
A word limit and specified points to cover make this a restricted-response essay.
Restricted-response essays limit the content and/or scope of the answer, while extended-response essays give wide freedom.
Explaining how motivations produce a turning point requires analysis, a higher-order process than simply recalling a definition.
Broad content sampling used to establish relative standing is characteristic of norm-referenced testing.
Criterion-referenced tests focus on a clearly defined learning domain, unlike norm-referenced tests that sample broadly to rank students.
Criterion-referenced scores are interpreted against predetermined standards, so one student's score does not affect another's interpretation.
Norm-referenced testing compares individuals with other members of the group, which suits selecting the top performers.
Criterion-referenced testing judges mastery of specified learning outcomes regardless of how other students perform.
Ipsative assessment compares a learner's current performance with his or her own earlier performance rather than with others.
Self-assessment is the classic example of assessment as learning, where learners reflect on and regulate their own learning.
Assessment as learning involves students monitoring their own progress, setting targets and adjusting study strategies (self-assessment).
Summative assessment evaluates outcomes at the end of a program or course.
Difficulties are first handled through formative assessment during teaching; if they persist, deeper diagnostic assessment follows.
Formative assessment addresses immediate instructional problems during learning, so calling this diagnostic would be inappropriate.
A final examination that judges course outcomes and informs program decisions is summative: product-oriented and given at the end.
Measurement records quantity (scores), while assessment goes further by interpreting performance data to judge the quantity and quality of learning.
Evaluation combines several kinds of evidence to make a value judgment about the success of a program.
Measurement only assigns numbers to performance; it does not interpret what the numbers mean.
Formative assessment monitors learning while instruction is in progress and feeds back into adjusting the next lesson.