Election Comission of Pakistan 2025 Past Paper

Section 206 of the relevant Elections Act is a crucial provision aimed at ensuring greater representation of women in the political landscape. This section specifically mandates that political parties must allocate a minimum percentage of tickets to women candidates for general seats in national and provincial assemblies. The correct answer, 5%, is the legally stipulated minimum percentage under this section.

This provision encourages political parties to actively involve women in the electoral process by reserving a certain proportion of candidacies for them. Options such as

• 10%,
• 20%, and
• 15%

are incorrect because they exceed the minimum threshold explicitly defined in Section 206. While higher percentages might be desirable for greater representation, the law, as stated in this specific section, sets the floor at 5%, making it the accurate answer for the minimum requirement.

Section 208 of the Elections Act governs the internal democratic processes of political parties, specifically addressing the frequency of their internal elections. While political parties are free to conduct elections according to their own constitutions, this section imposes a crucial limit to ensure regular democratic functioning. The correct answer is 5 years, meaning the interval between two consecutive internal party elections cannot exceed this period.

This provision aims to promote internal democracy and accountability within political parties, preventing prolonged periods without leadership changes or member participation in decision-making. Options like

• 10 years and
• 15 years

are incorrect as they represent excessively long intervals that would undermine democratic principles. Conversely,

• 3 years

, while promoting more frequent elections, is not the maximum limit prescribed by Section 208, making it an inaccurate choice for the specified legal constraint.

The process of filing and scrutinizing nomination papers is a critical stage in any election. When a Returning Officer makes a decision to either reject or accept a candidate's nomination papers, the affected party has a legal right to appeal. The correct forum for such an appeal is the Appellate Tribunal.

This tribunal is specifically constituted to hear and decide appeals related to nomination paper decisions, ensuring a swift and specialized review before the election proceeds.

• The Election Tribunal (B)

is generally responsible for hearing election petitions that challenge the overall election results after polling, not pre-election nomination issues.

• The Election Commission (C)

is the supervisory body for conducting elections but typically delegates such specific appeals to dedicated tribunals. Therefore, "all" (D) is incorrect, as the Appellate Tribunal is the precise body for this specific type of appeal.

Caretaker governments play a vital role in ensuring a level playing field during the transitional period leading up to general elections. Their functions and limitations are precisely defined in the relevant electoral law to prevent any undue influence on the electoral process. The correct answer is Section 230, which specifically delineates the powers, responsibilities, and restrictions of a caretaker government.

This section ensures that the caretaker setup maintains neutrality, performs routine administrative tasks, and refrains from making major policy decisions or undertaking new development projects that could impact the election outcome. Options such as

• Section 215,
• Section 115, and
• Section 90

are incorrect as they refer to different provisions within the Elections Act, not the one pertaining to the functions of the caretaker government. Understanding this specific section is crucial for comprehending the legal framework governing transitional administrations.

The Elections Act, 2017, is a landmark piece of legislation that consolidated and amended various laws relating to the conduct of elections in the country. Knowing the specific timeline of its enactment is important for understanding its historical context. The correct answer is October, as the Elections Act, 2017, was officially adopted and came into effect in October of that year.

This Act was the culmination of extensive legislative efforts to reform the electoral system, aiming to make elections more transparent, fair, and efficient. Options such as

• August and
• September

are incorrect because the legislative process concluded and the Act was formally adopted in the subsequent month.

• "All of the above"

is also incorrect as the Act was adopted in a single specific month, not across multiple months in that manner. Therefore, October is the precise month of its adoption.

The term "election agent" is fundamental in electoral law, defining a key role in a candidate's campaign. Under the Elections Act, the definition of an election agent is comprehensive. The correct answer is Both A & B, meaning it refers to a person specifically appointed by a candidate as their election agent, and it may also refer to the candidates themselves if they choose to act in that capacity.

This dual interpretation ensures flexibility while maintaining accountability for campaign activities.

• Option A

is partially correct but incomplete, as it omits the possibility of the candidate acting as their own agent.

• Option B

is also partially correct but incomplete for the same reason, as candidates frequently appoint others.

• "Neither A nor B"

is incorrect because both aspects are integral to the full definition. Therefore, understanding that a candidate can either appoint an agent or serve as their own agent is crucial for comprehending this role.

When establishing urban election areas, various geographical and administrative units are considered. A Census Block is a fundamental statistical area used by census bureaus for data collection and population enumeration. Its boundaries are meticulously defined and maintained to ensure accurate demographic representation. Therefore, dividing a census block for electoral purposes is generally avoided except under exceptional circumstances because it can compromise the integrity of statistical data and lead to inaccuracies in population counts and representation.

Conversely, Wards and Mohallahs (neighborhoods) are administrative or local government divisions that are more flexible. Their boundaries can often be adjusted or subdivided to create suitable election areas without significantly impacting core statistical data. These divisions are commonly used as electoral units and can be modified to accommodate changes in population or administrative needs, unlike the more rigid structure of a census block. Thus, only the census block is typically protected from division.

In the context of an Elections Act, the term "government" is typically defined very broadly to ensure that the law applies comprehensively across all levels of administration involved in the electoral process. This inclusive definition is crucial because elections, whether national, provincial, or local, require the participation and cooperation of various governmental bodies.

Therefore, All of the above is the correct answer. The Federal Government establishes overarching legal frameworks and policies, the Provincial Governments manage elections within their respective provinces and implement federal laws, and Local Governments play a vital role in the ground-level administration, logistics, and conduct of elections, especially local body polls. Limiting the definition to just one level (Federal, Provincial, or Local) would create significant gaps in the Act's applicability and enforcement, as all tiers contribute to the smooth functioning of the electoral machinery.

The definition of a "Presiding Officer" in an Elections Act is designed to ensure clarity and continuity in the management of polling stations. A Presiding Officer is the chief authority at a polling station, responsible for maintaining order, ensuring fair voting, and overseeing the entire process. However, operational realities necessitate a flexible definition.

Therefore, Both A & B is the correct answer. The definition typically includes the individual specifically appointed as the Presiding Officer for a polling station (Option A). Crucially, it also extends to an Assistant Presiding Officer who is performing the functions of the Presiding Officer (Option B). This provision is vital for situations where the appointed Presiding Officer might be absent, incapacitated, or needs to delegate duties. It ensures that the polling process can continue legally and without interruption, with the Assistant Presiding Officer assuming full authority and responsibility when acting in that capacity.

Election acts are structured into distinct sections, each addressing specific aspects of the electoral process. Understanding which section governs a particular procedure is fundamental for legal interpretation and compliance. The alteration or amendment of an election program is a critical provision, allowing for flexibility in response to unforeseen circumstances while maintaining legal oversight.

In this context, Sec 58 is the correct answer. This section specifically outlines the legal framework, conditions, and authorities under which an election program can be modified. Such alterations might include extending nomination deadlines, rescheduling polling dates, or adjusting other timelines due to emergencies, natural disasters, or other valid reasons. Section 57, conversely, would typically cover a different aspect, such as the initial announcement or publication of the election program, rather than its subsequent alteration. Therefore, only Section 58 directly addresses the power to alter the election program.

The Quran, Islam's holy book, is divided into chapters called Surahs, each with distinct themes. Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow) is famously known as "The Continuation of the Muslim State" because it is the longest Surah in the Quran and provides comprehensive guidance on establishing and maintaining a stable Muslim society. Revealed primarily in Medina, it lays down foundational principles for the nascent Muslim state, covering laws related to family, finance, warfare, and social conduct, crucial for community building and governance.

• Surah An-Nisa (The Women) primarily focuses on women's rights, family law, and inheritance.
• Surah Al-Ma'idah (The Table Spread) deals with legal rulings, dietary laws, and interactions with People of the Book.
• Surah Al-Ahzab (The Confederates) discusses the Battle of the Trench and social issues, particularly concerning the Prophet's household.

The Objective Resolution is a landmark document in Pakistan's constitutional history, outlining the foundational principles for the nation's future constitution. It was presented and passed by the first Constituent Assembly. Liaqat Ali Khan, Pakistan's first Prime Minister, moved the Objective Resolution in the Constituent Assembly on March 7, 1949. This pivotal resolution established the guiding principles of sovereignty, democracy, and social justice, forming the ideological basis for Pakistan's constitutional framework, thus making him the correct answer.

• Muhammad Ali Bogra served as Prime Minister much later (1953-1955) and was not involved in moving this resolution.
• Ch. Muhammad Ali became Prime Minister in 1955 and played a key role in the 1956 Constitution, but not the Objective Resolution.
• Ayub Khan became President through a coup in 1958, long after the resolution was passed.

The given sequence 121, 144, 169, 196 follows a clear mathematical pattern involving perfect squares of consecutive integers. A foundational understanding of squares reveals that 121 is 11 squared (11 x 11), 144 is 12 squared (12 x 12), 169 is 13 squared (13 x 13), and 196 is 14 squared (14 x 14).

To find the next number, we must continue this progression by squaring the next consecutive integer, which is 15. Calculating 15 x 15 yields 225, making option A the accurate answer. Options B (256, which is 16 squared), C (289, which is 17 squared), and D (324, which is 18 squared) are incorrect because while they are perfect squares, they do not maintain the sequential order of the base numbers (11, 12, 13, 14, 15) established in the given series.

The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) is an independent constitutional body responsible for organizing and conducting elections. Its impartiality and effectiveness depend heavily on the appointment process of its key officials.

The correct answer is C: 213. Article 213 of the Constitution of Pakistan specifically outlines the procedure for the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and members of the Election Commission. It mandates that the President makes these appointments after consultation and in accordance with the prescribed constitutional mechanism, ensuring the independence and credibility of the ECP.

• A: 232 is incorrect. Article 232 deals with the Proclamation of Emergency.
• B: 224 is incorrect. Article 224 pertains to the time of election and bye-election.
• D: 250 is incorrect. Article 250 deals with the protection of the President, Governors, etc., from legal proceedings.

For the Election Commission to effectively discharge its constitutional mandate and enforce its decisions, it requires powers similar to a court, including the ability to punish for contempt.

The correct answer is Section 10. This section of the Elections Act, 2017, specifically empowers the Election Commission to punish for contempt of its authority, orders, or proceedings. This power is fundamental for the ECP to maintain its dignity, ensure compliance with its directives, and prevent any obstruction or defiance of its functions, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process. Without this power, the Commission's ability to act decisively would be severely hampered.

The other options are incorrect:

• Section 80 typically relates to election disputes or petitions.
• Section 100 often covers general provisions or rules.
• Section 6 usually pertains to the general functions or establishment of the Commission, not specific judicial-like powers such as contempt.

Understanding synonyms is a key aspect of vocabulary and language comprehension. Synonyms are words that share the same or very similar meanings. The word "Abundant" describes something existing or available in large quantities; plentiful. It implies a surplus or a great deal of something.

Therefore, Plentiful is the correct synonym. If resources are abundant, it means there are plentiful resources, indicating a large and sufficient supply. For example, "The region has abundant wildlife" means "The region has plentiful wildlife." The other options are antonyms or words with opposite meanings. Scare (likely a typo for "scarce") means insufficient or rare. Limited means restricted in amount or extent. Rare means not occurring often or in large quantities. All these words convey a sense of lack or scarcity, which is the direct opposite of abundance.

Early Islamic history in Medina involved establishing a new community and defining its interactions with diverse groups. The Constitution of Medina (Sahifat al-Madinah), often simply called the Treaty of Medina, was a pivotal document drafted by Prophet Muhammad. This constitution established a multi-religious state, outlining the rights and responsibilities of all inhabitants, including Muslims, Jews, and other pagan tribes. It ensured their peaceful coexistence, religious freedom, and mutual defense, creating a unified community (Ummah) under the Prophet's leadership.

• The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah was a peace treaty between Prophet Muhammad and the Quraysh of Mecca, primarily concerning pilgrimage rights and a truce.
• The Battle of Khaybar was a military campaign against a Jewish community, not a treaty of coexistence.
• The Treaty of Najran was a specific agreement with the Christian community of Najran, guaranteeing their protection in exchange for tribute, not the overarching constitution for Medina.

The primary architect of the nationalization policies implemented in Pakistan during the early 1970s was Dr. Mubashir Hassan. As the Finance Minister under the government of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Dr. Hassan was the key ideological and administrative force behind the major economic shifts of that era, including the nationalization of industries, banks, and insurance companies. While Mahbub ul Haq was a prominent economist known for his work on the Human Development Index and his earlier association with Ayub Khan’s administration, he was not the architect of the socialist-leaning nationalization program of 1973. Dr. Mubashir Hassan advocated for a "socialist" economic framework, aiming to reduce the concentration of wealth by bringing critical sectors under state control to facilitate more equitable economic distribution, a policy that fundamentally reshaped Pakistan's economic landscape during the 1970s.

To solve this sequence, we need to identify the mathematical rule connecting each number to the next. Let's examine the progression: from 4 to 9, from 9 to 19, and from 19 to 39. The pattern is consistently 'multiply the previous number by 2, then add 1'.

• 4 x 2 + 1 = 9
• 9 x 2 + 1 = 19
• 19 x 2 + 1 = 39

Applying this rule to the last number in the sequence, 39, we perform the calculation: 39 x 2 + 1 = 78 + 1 = 79. Therefore, option B is the correct answer. Options A (59), C (61), and D (81) are incorrect because they do not adhere to the established 'multiply by 2 and add 1' pattern of the sequence.

The Constitution of Pakistan, like many modern constitutions, enshrines fundamental rights for its citizens. These rights are crucial for ensuring justice, fairness, and the protection of individual liberties within the state.

The correct answer is B: Equality of citizen. Article 25 of the 1973 Constitution of Pakistan explicitly states, "All citizens are equal before law and are entitled to equal protection of law." This fundamental right ensures that no person or group is discriminated against and that everyone receives fair and impartial treatment under the legal system, making 'Equality of citizen' the most accurate description.

• A: Rule of Law is incorrect. While Article 25 contributes to the Rule of Law, it specifically addresses the equality aspect rather than the broader concept of the Rule of Law itself.
• C: Equal protection of Law is incorrect. This is a crucial component and phrase *within* Article 25, but the overall theme and heading of the article is the broader 'Equality of citizen', which encompasses both being equal before the law and entitled to its equal protection.
• D: All of these is incorrect because 'Rule of Law' is too broad, and 'Equality of citizen' is the most comprehensive and direct answer.

The sentence \"It\'s raining outside; take an umbrella.\" is correctly punctuated. The contraction \"It\'s\" means \"It is\", while the semicolon (;) correctly joins two closely related independent clauses.

• It\'s = Correct contraction of It is.
• Its = Possessive form, not correct here.
• Semicolon (;) = Correctly joins two independent clauses.
• Comma (,) alone creates a comma splice in this sentence.

Therefore, the correct answer is: \"It\'s raining outside; take an umbrella.\"

Islamic jurisprudence employs various principles to derive legal rulings, especially for matters not explicitly covered in primary texts. The principle that allows a jurist to issue a legal opinion based on reasoning and public welfare (maslaha mursalah) is Istislah. Primarily associated with the Maliki school of thought, Istislah permits jurists to formulate rulings that serve the common good and prevent harm, provided they do not contradict established Islamic principles, thereby addressing new societal needs.

• Qiyas is analogical reasoning, deriving a ruling by comparing a new case to an existing one with a known ruling, based on shared effective cause, not solely public welfare.
• Ijtihad is the broader process of independent reasoning by a qualified jurist to derive a ruling, of which Istislah can be a method, but Ijtihad itself is the *act* of striving for a ruling.
• Ijma' (Jima) is the consensus of Muslim scholars on a legal issue, not an individual jurist's reasoning based on public welfare.

The Objective Resolution is a cornerstone document in Pakistan's constitutional development, laying down the fundamental principles for the state. It was debated and passed by the first Constituent Assembly. The famous Objective Resolution was moved by Prime Minister Liaqat Ali Khan on March 7, 1949, and subsequently passed by the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan on March 12, 1949. This resolution served as the preamble to Pakistan's subsequent constitutions, establishing the ideological foundation for the nation, thus making 1949 the correct answer.

• 1947 was the year of Pakistan's independence, but the resolution was formulated later.
• 1956 was when Pakistan's first constitution was promulgated, which incorporated the resolution, but it was passed earlier.
• 1962 was the year of Pakistan's second constitution under Ayub Khan, also incorporating the resolution, but not its passing year.

This question asks us to complete an analogy, which requires identifying the relationship between the first pair of words and applying that same relationship to the second pair. The first pair is Book: Reading. The relationship here is that a book is an object whose primary purpose or function is reading.

Following this logic, we need to find the primary purpose or function of a Fork. A fork is a utensil primarily designed and used for the act of eating. Therefore, Eating is the correct answer, as it directly corresponds to the primary function of a fork. Options A (Drawing), B (Writing), and D (Cooking) are incorrect because while a fork might be tangentially involved in cooking, or one could theoretically draw with it, none represent its fundamental and primary purpose in the same way reading is to a book.

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 is the supreme law of the land, providing the framework for the government and defining fundamental rights. It was adopted by the National Assembly on April 10, 1973, but its enforcement was strategically set for a date of national significance. The correct answer is A: 14th Aug 1973. This date marks Pakistan's Independence Day, making the enforcement of the new constitution a symbolic gesture of national sovereignty and the establishment of a fully functional constitutional government. Distractor B, 15th July 1973, holds no constitutional relevance. Distractor C, 23rd March 1973, is Pakistan Day, commemorating the Lahore Resolution and the adoption of the 1956 Constitution, but not the enforcement of the 1973 Constitution. Distractor D, 27th Oct 1, is an incomplete and incorrect date.