In the interim relief example, the EPO was suspended because:

Interim relief is granted when there is an urgent need to prevent significant, often irreversible, harm before the main case can be fully adjudicated. In the example, the EPO (Ex-Parte Order) was suspended because goods may spoil causing huge loss (B). This represents a clear and immediate threat of irreparable financial damage, which is a primary justification for granting interim relief. The court acts to mitigate such losses.

• (A) Whether the EO was wrong is the ultimate question to be decided in the main case, not the immediate reason for interim relief.
• (C) The shopkeeper was powerful is irrelevant to the legal criteria for granting interim relief.
• (D) If the nuisance was minor, it would likely not meet the threshold for urgent interim relief, which is reserved for substantial harm.