This question distinguishes between two types of orders: an Emergency Prohibition Order (EPO) and an Absolute Order. EPOs are typically immediate and temporary, while Absolute Orders are more definitive. The correct answer is Final and enforceable with penalties.
An Absolute Order signifies a conclusive decision after due process, making it final. Its enforceability, often backed by penalties for non-compliance, is its defining characteristic, distinguishing it from a temporary EPO.
Temporary (A) describes an EPO, not an Absolute Order, which is intended to be definitive.
Issued by the EO (C) is not the key distinguishing feature; both types of orders might be issued by an Executive Officer or similar authority.
Not appealable (D) is generally false; most legal orders, including Absolute Orders, typically have provisions for appeal, though their finality refers to their status in the initial administrative process.