The key distinction between Rule 10 (ex-parte) and Rule 11 (dismissal for default) is:

The fundamental difference between Rule 10 (ex-parte proceedings) and Rule 11 (dismissal for default) lies in the possibility of rejoining the proceedings (B). In an ex-parte hearing, the absent party can often apply to set aside the order and rejoin the case by demonstrating a 'good cause' for their absence. This allows the case to continue without them initially but offers a path back.

• (A) The type of case is not the distinguishing factor; both rules apply to various case types.
• (C) The amount of fine imposed is a potential consequence, not the core procedural distinction.
• (D) Who is present in the hearing is a condition that triggers these rules, but the *consequence* for the absent party regarding their ability to participate further is the key distinction.