This question focuses on the fundamental rights and powers of an authorized officer during an administrative hearing. Cross-examine and rebut evidence is the correct answer because, in a fair and just hearing, the authorized officer must have the ability to critically evaluate and challenge the evidence and arguments presented by all parties. This right is crucial for ensuring due process, verifying facts, and reaching an informed, impartial decision based on substantiated information.
Issue new orders (A) is incorrect; orders are typically issued after the hearing concludes, not during the proceedings.
Adjourn the hearing (C) is a procedural power but not the primary right related to handling evidence during the core of the hearing.
Overrule the Hearing Officer (D) is incorrect; the authorized officer often acts as or is synonymous with the Hearing Officer, or operates within a defined hierarchy, making this option generally inapplicable as a direct right during the hearing itself.