MODEL PAPER 171 📘 PMS 2025 – S&GAD Paper | PPSC Past Papers
Prepare effectively for the PMS 2025 Exam with authentic S&GAD (Services & General Administration Department) past papers from PPSC. These past papers provide a comprehensive collection of previously asked questions, covering important topics in Pakistan Affairs, Islamiat, Current Affairs, General Knowledge, English, Everyday Science, and Administrative Concepts.
By practicing these papers, aspirants can:
✅ Understand exam pattern & question style.
✅ Revise key concepts relevant to PMS & PPSC tests.
✅ Improve time management & accuracy.
✅ Strengthen preparation with real exam-based material.
Whether you are preparing for PMS 2025 or other PPSC competitive exams, these S&GAD past papers serve as an essential guide for smart preparation.
The congregational prayer of Tarawih (Ba Jammat) was formally established and prayed for the first time during the caliphate of Hazrat Umar (RA). While the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and Hazrat Abu Bakr (RA) prayed Tarawih, it was often individually or in small groups. Hazrat Umar (RA) observed people praying in scattered groups and decided to unify them under one Imam, Ubayy ibn Ka'b, to ensure a more organized and consistent practice during Ramadan nights.
Hazrat Abu Bakr (RA) was the first caliph, but the formal congregational practice was not during his time.
Hazrat Usman (RA) and Hazrat Ali (RA) were later caliphs, by which time the practice was already established.
Thus, Hazrat Umar (RA) is credited with organizing the congregational Tarawih prayer.
In the science of Hadith, a Hadith in which the chain of narrators remains unbroken and continuous from the first narrator all the way back to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is called Mutassil (or Musnad). This continuity is a crucial criterion for assessing the authenticity and reliability of a Hadith, ensuring that no links are missing in its transmission.
A Hasan Hadith is a classification based on the strength of its narrators and chain, being good but not as strong as Sahih.
A Mutawatir Hadith is one narrated by such a large number of narrators at each stage that it is impossible for them to have conspired to fabricate it; it focuses on the number of narrators, not just continuity.
The question asks about the compiler of a book by Ahmad bin Shoaib (RA). Ahmad bin Shoaib is famously known as Imam An-Nasa'i, and his renowned compilation of Hadith is Sunan an-Nasa'i. Since Sunan an-Nasa'i is not listed among the options, "None of these" is the correct answer.
Tirmazi (Sunan al-Tirmidhi) was compiled by Imam Abu Isa Muhammad ibn Isa al-Tirmidhi.
Al Bukhari (Sahih al-Bukhari) was compiled by Imam Muhammad al-Bukhari.
Ibn Maja (Sunan Ibn Majah) was compiled by Imam Muhammad ibn Yazid ibn Majah.
Each of these scholars compiled their respective collections, distinct from Imam An-Nasa'i's work.
The question asks what will be the heaviest thing in the book of deeds on the Day of Judgment. According to Islamic teachings, حسن اخلاق (good manners or excellent character) holds immense weight.
The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said, "There is nothing heavier in the scales than good character." This emphasizes its paramount importance.
While نماز (prayer) and حج (Hajj) are fundamental pillars of Islam and carry great reward, the Hadith specifically highlights good character as the heaviest.
حقوق العباد (rights of people) are also crucial and are often intertwined with good character, as treating others justly and kindly is a manifestation of good manners. However, "good character" is a broader concept that encompasses these rights and more.
The book "Kitab al-Kharaj" (The Book of Land Tax) is a foundational text on Islamic public finance and taxation, authored by Imam Abu Yusuf. He was a prominent student of Imam Abu Hanifa and served as the chief judge (Qadi al-Qudat) during the Abbasid Caliphate under Caliph Harun al-Rashid, advising him on fiscal and administrative matters. His work systematically outlines principles of taxation, land ownership, and state revenue in an Islamic context.
Imam Abu Hanifa was Abu Yusuf's teacher and a founder of the Hanafi school of thought, but he did not author this specific book.
Imam Shafi founded the Shafi'i school of thought, distinct from the Hanafi school.
Muhammad Al Shaybani was another influential student of Abu Hanifa, known for his contributions to Islamic law, but "Kitab al-Kharaj" is attributed to Abu Yusuf.
The title Khateeb-ul-Anbia, meaning 'The Orator of the Prophets', was bestowed upon Hazrat Shoaib (AS). This foundational concept in Islamic history recognizes his eloquent and persistent preaching to his people, the Madyanites, urging them to abandon idolatry and corruption. He was renowned for his powerful sermons and logical arguments.
Hazrat Idrees (AS) is known for his wisdom and knowledge.
Hazrat Yaqoob (AS) is known as Isra'il.
Hazrat Ibrahim (AS) is revered as Khalilullah, the 'Friend of Allah'.
Therefore, Hazrat Shoaib (AS) is the correct answer due to his distinctive role as a powerful orator among the prophets.
The correct answer is 16. At the time of the Partition of India in 1947, the newly formed Pakistan inherited a significantly underdeveloped industrial base. Out of 451 cotton mills in British India, Pakistan received only 16. This stark imbalance highlighted the economic challenges faced by the new nation, despite being a major producer of raw cotton. The lack of processing infrastructure meant Pakistan had to export raw materials and import finished goods, hindering its economic growth.
Options 33 and 50 are incorrect and significantly higher than the actual number, which would imply a much stronger industrial inheritance than was the reality.
None of these is incorrect as 16 is the precise figure.
This analogy question requires identifying a similar relationship between two pairs of words. The initial pair is Conductor : Bus, where a conductor is a person who works on or operates a bus, managing passengers and tickets.
The correct analogy is Thespian : Play (Option C). A thespian is an actor, and an actor performs in a play, establishing a similar person-to-activity/setting relationship.
Drama : Director (Option A) is incorrect because a director oversees a drama, but the relationship isn't as direct as a person working on the object/event itself.
Producer : Theater (Option B) is also incorrect; a producer manages or funds a theater, but doesn't typically 'work on' it in the same operational sense as a conductor on a bus.
Why 'Spots' is correct: "A leopard can’t change its spots" is a well-known English idiom. This phrase means that a person cannot change their fundamental nature, character, or inherent traits, especially their bad habits or personality flaws. Leopards are recognized by their distinctive spots, which are an unchangeable part of their appearance, serving as a metaphor for unchangeable personal characteristics.
Why other options are incorrect:
'Food' is not part of this established idiom. While leopards eat food, it has no idiomatic connection to changing one's nature.
'Nature', although related to the meaning of the idiom, is not the word used to complete the phrase itself. The idiom uses "spots" to symbolize inherent nature.
'None of these' is incorrect because "Spots" is the precise and correct word to complete the idiom.
The correct answer is Ubaid Ullah Sindhi. The Silk Letter Movement (Reshmi Rumal Tehreek) was an anti-British conspiracy during World War I, primarily initiated by Maulana Ubaid Ullah Sindhi and Maulana Mahmud al-Hasan. The movement aimed to overthrow British rule in India by forming an alliance with Afghanistan and Ottoman Turkey, sending secret letters written on silk cloth to various leaders. It represented a significant pan-Islamic and anti-colonial effort.
Maulana Shaukat Ali and Maulana Muhammad Ali Jauhar were prominent leaders of the Khilafat Movement, which emerged later, advocating for the protection of the Ottoman Caliphate and Indian Muslim rights, but they did not initiate the Silk Letter Movement.
None of these is incorrect as Ubaid Ullah Sindhi is the correct initiator.
This question tests the correct usage of prepositions in English, a foundational concept in grammar. The phrase 'take revenge' requires a specific preposition to form a grammatically correct and idiomatic expression.
The correct preposition to use with 'take revenge' when referring to the target of the revenge is on. Thus, 'I took revenge on my enemy' (Option C) is the correct phrasing.
Using 'From' (Option A) or 'To' (Option B) would be grammatically incorrect in this context. 'From' would imply receiving revenge, and 'To' would imply giving revenge to someone, neither of which fits the standard idiom for taking revenge against an enemy.
The correct answer is To be successful/victorious.
Why 'To be successful/victorious' is correct: The idiom "carry the day" means to win a contest, argument, election, or any form of competition; to achieve victory or success. It implies prevailing over opposition or achieving a desired outcome, often after a struggle or debate. For example, "Her compelling argument carried the day in the debate."
Why other options are incorrect:
'To be exhausted after the game' describes a physical state of tiredness, which is unrelated to the meaning of winning or achieving success.
'To lose the game' is the direct opposite of what "carry the day" means. The idiom signifies triumph, not defeat.
'None of these' is incorrect because "To be successful/victorious" accurately defines the idiom.
The correct answer is 1911. The Partition of Bengal, enacted by Lord Curzon in 1905, divided the province into two parts, sparking widespread nationalist protests and unrest across India. The British government, facing intense political agitation and a desire to appease Indian nationalists, decided to annul the partition in 1911 during the Delhi Durbar. This decision was a significant victory for the Indian nationalist movement.
1905 was the year the Partition of Bengal was enacted, not annulled.
1920 was a period of the Non-Cooperation Movement, unrelated to the annulment.
1947 marks the year of India's independence and the final partition of British India.
This question asks for the term describing a person who values things practically, which relates to understanding different philosophical or personality types. The correct answer is Pragmatist.
A Pragmatist (Option C) is an individual who approaches problems and situations in a practical, realistic, and sensible way, focusing on what is effective and works in practice rather than on theories or ideals.
An Idealist (Option A) is someone who is guided by ideals and principles, often to the exclusion of practical considerations, which is the opposite of the description.
An Optimist (Option B) is a person who tends to be hopeful and confident about the future or the success of something, which describes a disposition rather than a practical approach to things.
Why 'Why didn’t you go?' is correct: This sentence follows the standard grammatical structure for an interrogative sentence (a question) in English. The structure is: Question Word (Why) + Auxiliary Verb (did + not/n't) + Subject (you) + Main Verb (go, in its base form after 'did'). The question mark at the end correctly indicates it's a question.
Why other options are incorrect:
'Why didn’t go you?' is incorrect due to improper word order. In a question, the subject ("you") must come before the main verb ("go").
'Why didn’t you gol' contains a misspelling of the verb "go" as "gol" and lacks the necessary question mark at the end, making it grammatically incorrect and incomplete as a question.
'None of these' is incorrect because option A is a perfectly formed and grammatically correct sentence.
The correct answer is 1989. The Tiananmen Square protests and the subsequent crackdown by the Chinese government occurred in June 1989. During this sensitive period, Pakistan, upholding its long-standing
The subject of a sentence is the person, place, thing, or idea that performs the action. In the sentence "I met a beggar on the road.", the pronoun "I" performs the action of meeting, so it is the subject.
Sentence Structure:
Subject: I
Verb: met
Object: a beggar
Prepositional Phrase: on the road
Why the other options are incorrect:
Met: This is the verb, not the subject.
Beggar: This is the object (receiver of the action), not the subject.
Road: This is part of the prepositional phrase indicating location.
Pakistan gained independence in August 1947. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) was established in 1944 to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world. Countries typically join such institutions shortly after their independence to integrate into the global financial system.
1950 is the correct answer. Pakistan officially became a member of the IMF on July 11, 1950, a few years after its independence.
1947 is incorrect; while Pakistan became independent in 1947, its formal membership in the IMF occurred later.
1948 is incorrect as Pakistan's membership was not finalized in this year.
None of these is incorrect because 1950 is the accurate year of membership.
The correct preposition to use with 'proficient' when referring to a subject or area of skill is 'in'. Therefore, 'He is proficient in math' is the grammatically correct phrase.
A. In: This is correct. 'Proficient in' means skilled or expert in a particular field or activity.
B. With: 'Proficient with' is typically used when referring to tools or people (e.g., proficient with a computer, proficient with children), not subjects.
C. At: 'Proficient at' is used for specific tasks or activities (e.g., proficient at playing chess), but 'in' is preferred for broader subjects.
D. Off: This preposition is entirely incorrect in this context.
The phrase “Many a/an” is a grammatical construction that, despite implying plurality, always takes a singular noun and a singular verb. It emphasizes individual items within a large group.
Was is the correct option because the subject “Many a man” requires a singular verb. Although it refers to multiple men, the structure treats it as a singular unit for verb agreement.
Were is incorrect because it is a plural verb, used with plural subjects.
Had been is incorrect because while it is singular, it implies a past perfect tense, suggesting an action completed before another past action, which is not the simple past tense required here.
The sentence describes a simple past event affecting many individuals.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) is a leading independent, non-governmental organization dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights in Pakistan. It plays a crucial role in monitoring human rights violations, advocating for policy reforms, and raising public awareness.
1986 is the correct answer. The HRCP was established in 1986 by a group of concerned citizens and human rights activists, during a period when civil society organizations were emerging to advocate for democratic values and human rights in the country.
1985 is incorrect; the HRCP was not founded in this year.
1987 is incorrect; the establishment of the commission predates this year.
None of these is incorrect as 1986 is the accurate founding year.
The sentence requires a verb that forms the present continuous tense to describe an ongoing action. The structure for the present continuous tense is 'subject + is/am/are + verb-ing'.
D. Is: This is the correct auxiliary verb to form the present continuous tense ('is cutting') with the singular subject 'The farmer'. It indicates that the action is happening now.
A. Was: This would form the past continuous tense ('was cutting'), implying the action happened in the past, which doesn't fit the implied present context.
B. Has: This would typically be used for the present perfect tense ('has cut') or present perfect continuous ('has been cutting'), neither of which fits directly with 'cutting' alone to describe an ongoing action.
C. Had: This would form the past perfect tense ('had cut') or past perfect continuous ('had been cutting'), indicating an action completed before another past action.
Correct answer is:
A. She accused him of stealing her purse.
The verb “accuse” typically takes the preposition “of” when referring to the charge or crime someone is blamed for. This is a standard idiomatic usage in English.
She accused him of stealing her purse is the correct sentence because it uses the appropriate preposition “of” after “accused,” which is grammatically correct for specifying the offense.
She accuse him with stealing her purse is incorrect because “accuse with” is not the standard prepositional phrase.
She accused him to stealing her purse is also incorrect as “accuse to” is not used in this context.
Understanding correct preposition usage is crucial for accurate sentence construction.
The term 'Axis of Resistance' describes an informal political and military alliance in the Middle East. This alliance is primarily led by Iran and includes various state and non-state actors, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, various Iraqi Shia militias, and the Houthis in Yemen. Its defining characteristic is a shared opposition to Israel and, to varying degrees, to the United States and its allies.
Axis of Resistance is the correct answer. This term accurately identifies the coalition of groups and states aligned against Israel and Western influence in the region.
Jabhat al-Nusra and Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham are both Sunni Islamist militant groups primarily active in the Syrian Civil War, not a broad regional alliance against Israel.
Axis of Evil was a term coined by former U.S. President George W. Bush to describe countries like Iran, Iraq, and North Korea, but it is not an alliance formed by these countries themselves.