FPSC English MCQs with Answers (Most Important)

This sentence describes two past actions: completing homework and having dinner. The action of completing homework happened before dinner yesterday. The past perfect tense ("had completed") is used to indicate an action that was finished before another past action or a specific point in the past. The keyword "before" clearly signals the need for the past perfect to establish the sequence of events. "Completed" (simple past) would imply it happened at dinner or after, or without a clear sequence. "Completes" (simple present) and "has completed" (present perfect) are incorrect as the action occurred "yesterday".

This sentence describes an ongoing action in the past that was interrupted by another past action. The past continuous tense ("were playing") is used to describe an action that was in progress at a specific time in the past or when another action occurred. "When it started raining" indicates the interruption. "Play" (simple present) and "plays" (simple present for third person singular) are incorrect as the event happened in the past. "Played" (simple past) would suggest a completed action, not an ongoing one that was interrupted. The past continuous perfectly captures the simultaneous nature of the ongoing activity and the sudden interruption.

The word "already" indicates that an action has been completed at some unspecified time before now, and its result is relevant to the present. This is a classic use case for the present perfect tense ("have seen"). The present perfect connects a past action to the present. "See" (simple present) is incorrect. "Saw" (simple past) would be used if a specific past time were mentioned (e.g., "I saw the movie yesterday"). "Had seen" (past perfect) would be used if there was another past event that this action preceded (e.g., "I had seen the movie before you mentioned it").

This sentence describes two past actions, where one action was completed before the other. "By the time we arrived" sets a specific point in the past. The action of the guests leaving happened before this arrival. The past perfect tense ("had left") is correctly used to show an action that was completed before another past action. "Left" (simple past) would imply they left at the same time or after we arrived. "Leave" (simple present) and "leaves" (simple present for third person singular) are incorrect as the events are in the past.

To transform an active voice sentence into passive voice, the object of the active sentence becomes the subject of the passive sentence. The verb form changes to "be + past participle". The original subject ("They") is often omitted or introduced with "by". In the active sentence, "the results" is the object, and "will announce" is the future simple active verb. Therefore, in the passive voice, it becomes "will be announced". Options A, C, and D do not follow the correct structure for the future simple passive voice. "Will announce" is active, "are announced" is present simple passive, and "were announced" is past simple passive.

This sentence is in the passive voice, indicated by "by the team". The action of completing the work was performed by the team. The keyword "yesterday" indicates that the action happened in the past. Therefore, the past simple passive voice is required. The structure for past simple passive is "was/were + past participle". Since "the work" is singular, "was completed" is the correct form. "Completed" (active voice) is incorrect. "Is completed" (present passive) and "has completed" (present perfect active) are incorrect because the action happened "yesterday".

To convert an active voice sentence in the present perfect tense to passive voice, the structure changes from "has/have + past participle" to "has/have + been + past participle". In the active sentence, "my bag" is the object, and "has stolen" is the present perfect active verb. Therefore, in the passive voice, "my bag" becomes the subject, and the verb phrase becomes "has been stolen". Options B, C, and D do not follow the correct present perfect passive structure. "Had stolen" is past perfect active, "stole" is simple past active, and "is stolen" is simple present passive.

This sentence requires a modal verb ("should") followed by a passive infinitive. When a modal verb is used in the passive voice, the structure is "modal verb + be + past participle". The form is not performing the action of filling; it is being filled. Therefore, "be filled" is the correct passive infinitive form. "Fill" (active infinitive) would imply the form itself is doing the filling. "Filled" (past participle without "be") and "filling" (present participle) are grammatically incorrect in this context following "should".

The correct answer is "has". This question tests your knowledge of subject-verb agreement when using correlative conjunctions like "neither... nor." The rule for "neither... nor" can be a bit tricky, but it's straightforward once you understand it.

• Rule of Proximity: When two or more subjects are joined by "neither... nor" or "either... or," the verb agrees with the subject that is closest to it.
• Applying the rule: In the sentence "Neither Ali nor Ahmed __________ completed the task," the two subjects are "Ali" and "Ahmed." Both "Ali" and "Ahmed" are singular nouns. The subject closest to the blank (and thus the verb) is "Ahmed."
• Singular verb: Since "Ahmed" is singular, the verb must also be singular. "Has" is the singular form of the verb "to have" in the present perfect tense, which is appropriate here. "Have" is plural.

Therefore, the correct sentence is: "Neither Ali nor Ahmed has completed the task." This ensures proper subject-verb agreement, making the sentence grammatically sound.

The idiom "kill two birds with one stone" means to accomplish two different things at the same time or with a single effort. It implies efficiency and effectiveness in achieving multiple objectives simultaneously. For example, if you go to the grocery store to buy food and also pick up your dry cleaning on the way, you are "killing two birds with one stone." The idiom does not literally refer to harming animals, nor does it suggest being cruel, hunting, or doing nothing. It is a common expression used to praise smart planning and multitasking.

The idiom "on cloud nine" describes a state of extreme happiness, joy, or elation. When someone is "on cloud nine," they are feeling incredibly pleased and delighted, often after receiving good news or experiencing a positive event. The phrase evokes a sense of floating high above the ground, symbolizing immense joy. It does not mean sad, confused, or angry. For instance, a person who just got engaged or received a promotion might be described as being "on cloud nine." This idiom is widely used to express profound contentment.

"Through thick and thin" is a widely recognized idiom that beautifully encapsulates the concept of unwavering loyalty and steadfast support, irrespective of life's varying circumstances. This phrase signifies a commitment to stand by someone or something during both the most prosperous and the most challenging periods. The "thick" metaphorically represents difficult, adverse, or complicated situations, while the "thin" refers to easier, more favorable, or less complicated times. Therefore, when someone pledges to be with another "through thick and thin," they are promising enduring companionship and assistance no matter what obstacles or successes come their way. It speaks to a deep level of dedication, resilience, and reliability in a relationship, whether it's a friendship, a romantic partnership, or even a professional alliance. This idiom emphasizes the importance of perseverance and constancy, highlighting that true support is not conditional but rather extends across all facets of life's journey. Thus, "in all situations" perfectly captures its comprehensive meaning.

"Turn a blind eye" is a common idiom that describes the deliberate act of ignoring something, often a wrongdoing, problem, or unpleasant truth, despite being fully aware of its existence. This phrase implies a conscious decision to overlook a situation, rather than addressing it or acknowledging its implications. The origin of the idiom is often attributed to Admiral Horatio Nelson, who, during the Battle of Copenhagen in 1801, famously put his telescope to his blind eye, claiming he "did not see the signal" to retreat. While the historical accuracy of this specific anecdote is debated, the idiom effectively conveys the idea of feigning ignorance. It suggests a passive form of complicity or a desire to avoid confrontation or responsibility. Therefore, "ignore intentionally" is the most precise meaning, as it highlights the willful nature of the act, distinguishing it from accidental oversight.

"Pull someone’s leg" is a popular English idiom used to describe the act of teasing, joking with, or playfully deceiving someone. It involves making someone believe something that isn't true, usually in a lighthearted and harmless manner, for amusement. The intention behind pulling someone's leg is not to cause distress or harm, but rather to create a moment of fun or playful trickery. For instance, if you tell a friend a ridiculous story that they initially believe, only to reveal later that you were joking, you were "pulling their leg." This idiom is often associated with good-natured banter and a sense of humor within relationships. It's a way to engage in playful interaction, testing someone's gullibility or simply enjoying a bit of harmless mischief. Therefore, "tease someone" accurately captures the essence of this playful and often affectionate interaction.

The idiom "at the eleventh hour" refers to something happening or being done at the very last possible moment, often implying a sense of urgency, delay, or near-miss. Its origin is rooted in the biblical parable of the laborers in Matthew 20:1-16, where workers are hired at various times throughout the day, including the "eleventh hour," which was the last hour of the working day (around 5 PM). This phrase has since evolved to signify a point just before it's too late, or the final opportunity. Actions taken at the eleventh hour are typically characterized by a rush or a narrow escape from failure. For example, a project submitted at the eleventh hour means it was completed just before the deadline. Therefore, "very late" is the most fitting interpretation, as it emphasizes the proximity to the absolute final point in time.

"Hit the sack" is an informal and common English idiom that means to go to bed or go to sleep. The phrase likely originated from the days when beds were often sacks filled with straw or other materials. When someone was ready to sleep, they would literally "hit the sack" to settle the filling before lying down. Over time, this literal action evolved into a metaphorical expression for retiring for the night. It's a casual way to announce one's intention to sleep, often used after a long day or when feeling tired. For example, after a strenuous day of work, one might say, "I'm exhausted; I'm going to hit the sack." This idiom is widely understood and used in everyday conversation, making it a straightforward and relatable expression for ending the day and getting some rest. Thus, "go to bed" is the precise meaning.

The correct answer is "is". This question tests your understanding of subject-verb agreement, specifically when a phrase like "along with" is used. In sentences where a singular subject is followed by a phrase introduced by "along with," "as well as," "in addition to," or "together with," the verb must agree with the main subject, not with the noun in the modifying phrase.

• The main subject: The true subject of the sentence is "The principal," which is singular.
• "along with teachers": This is a prepositional phrase that modifies "The principal." It does not change the number of the main subject. Think of it as extra information, similar to putting the phrase in parentheses.
• Singular verb: Since "The principal" is singular, the verb must also be singular. "Is" is the singular form of the verb "to be" in the present tense, making it the correct choice for a singular subject performing an action currently.

Therefore, the sentence correctly reads: "The principal along with teachers is attending the meeting."

The correct answer is "are". This question focuses on subject-verb agreement, particularly with the phrase "A number of." Understanding how this phrase functions is crucial for correct grammar.

• "A number of": When "A number of" precedes a plural noun, it functions as a quantifier indicating "many" or "several." In this construction, the phrase "a number of" makes the subject plural, and therefore requires a plural verb. For example, "A number of students" implies many students, acting as a plural subject.
• "The number of": It's important to distinguish this from "The number of." When "The number of" is used, it refers to a specific quantity, which is singular, and thus takes a singular verb (e.g., "The number of students is increasing").
• Plural noun "students": The noun following "A number of" is "students," which is plural.
• Plural verb "are": Since "A number of students" acts as a plural subject, the plural verb "are" is required.

Thus, the grammatically correct sentence is: "A number of students are absent today."

This analogy establishes a relationship between an organ and its primary sensory function. The first pair, Eye : See, clearly indicates that the eye is the organ responsible for the act of seeing. Following this pattern, we need to identify the primary function of the ear. The ear is the sensory organ dedicated to perceiving sound.

Therefore, the correct completion of the analogy is Ear : Hear. Hearing is the fundamental action performed by the ear, allowing us to interpret auditory information from our environment. Let's consider why other options are incorrect:

• A: Talk and C: Speak are functions primarily associated with the mouth and vocal cords, not the ear.
• D: Touch is a sense primarily associated with the skin, not the ear.

The analogy relies on a direct and essential functional link, making "Hear" the only logical choice that maintains the established relationship.

This analogy focuses on the relationship between an individual member and the larger organized group or branch of military service they belong to. In the first pair, Soldier : Army, a soldier is a member of the army, which is the land-based military force of a nation. Applying this same relationship, we need to identify the collective body to which a sailor belongs.

A sailor is a person who works on a ship or is involved in sailing, particularly as a member of a naval force. Therefore, the correct completion of the analogy is Sailor : Navy. The Navy is the branch of a nation's armed forces that conducts military operations at sea.

Let's examine the other options:

• A: Ship is the vessel a sailor works on, not the organization they belong to.
• C: Sea is the environment where the Navy operates, not the organization itself.
• D: Captain is a rank within the Navy, not the collective group.

The analogy correctly links the individual to their specific military branch.

This analogy establishes a relationship between an animal and its primary dwelling or home. The first pair, Bird : Nest, indicates that a nest is the structure a bird builds and uses as its home, particularly for laying eggs and raising young. Following this pattern, we need to identify the specific dwelling of a bee.

Bees, especially honey bees, live in highly organized communal structures. Therefore, the correct completion of the analogy is Bee : Hive. A hive is an artificial or natural structure where bees live and raise their young, typically producing honey and wax.

Let's consider why the other options are incorrect:

• B: Tree can be a location where a hive is found, but it is not the hive itself.
• C: Honey is a product made by bees, not their home.
• D: Flower is a source of nectar and pollen for bees, essential for their survival, but it is not their dwelling.

The analogy specifically links the animal to its characteristic habitat.

This analogy focuses on the relationship between a vital organ and its primary physiological action or function within the body. The first pair, Heart : Pump, clearly states that the heart's essential role is to pump blood throughout the circulatory system, ensuring oxygen and nutrient delivery. Applying this same functional relationship, we need to identify the primary action of the lungs.

The lungs are the primary organs of the respiratory system, responsible for facilitating gas exchange. Therefore, the correct completion of the analogy is Lungs : Breathe. Breathing is the process by which air is drawn into and expelled from the lungs, allowing oxygen to enter the bloodstream and carbon dioxide to be removed.

Let's examine the other options:

• B: Filter is a function more closely associated with organs like the kidneys or liver.
• C: Think is the primary function of the brain.
• D: Move is primarily associated with muscles and the skeletal system.

The analogy correctly identifies the core, defining action of each organ.

This question asks for the correct meaning of the idiom "Add fuel to the fire." Idioms are phrases where the meaning is not obvious from the individual words. The phrase "add fuel to the fire" uses a powerful metaphor to describe an action that intensifies an already existing negative situation or conflict.

When you add fuel to a literal fire, you make it burn hotter and bigger. Metaphorically, doing so means you are doing something that makes a bad situation, an argument, or a problem even worse or more intense. It implies exacerbating a conflict or making someone angrier.

Therefore, the correct meaning is B: Worsen a problem. Let's look at why the other options are incorrect:

• A: Calm a situation is the exact opposite of what the idiom means.
• C: Start cooking and D: Light a fire are literal interpretations of the words, not the figurative meaning of the idiom.

Understanding idioms requires recognizing their figurative sense, which in this case, points to escalating a negative circumstance.

The idiom "beat around the bush" means to avoid getting to the point or discussing the main topic directly. Instead of addressing an issue head-on, someone who "beats around the bush" might talk about irrelevant details, make excuses, or use vague language to delay or evade the core subject. This often happens when the topic is sensitive, uncomfortable, or when the speaker is hesitant to deliver bad news or confrontational information. For instance, if a manager needs to tell an employee they're being laid off, but starts by talking about company performance, then budget cuts, and only much later gets to the actual news, they are beating around the bush. The phrase originates from bird hunting, where hunters would beat bushes to flush out birds without directly entering the thicket themselves, thus approaching the target indirectly. Therefore, option B, "Avoid the main topic," is the correct meaning, as it perfectly captures the essence of indirect communication and evasion, often out of discomfort or a desire to soften the message. It's a common expression used to describe someone who is not being straightforward.

The idiom "call it a day" means to decide to stop working on something, or to conclude an activity for the day. It signifies the end of a period of work or effort, often implying that enough has been done, or that it's time to rest. This phrase is widely used in both professional and casual settings. For example, after a long day at the office, an employee might say, "I'm tired, I think I'll call it a day," meaning they are finishing their work for that particular day. Similarly, if a group is working on a project and decides they've made sufficient progress, one might suggest, "Let's call it a day and pick this up tomorrow." It doesn't necessarily mean going to sleep early or taking a holiday, but rather the cessation of current tasks. Therefore, option B, "End work," is the most accurate meaning, encapsulating the decision to stop an activity or job for the remainder of the day.